arden.net/Indentation there is the
> >> following example:
>
> >> %
>
> >> \setupindenting[medium,yes]
> >> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
>
> >> \startitemize
> >> \item
:
%
\setupindenting[medium,yes]
\setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
\startitemize
\item One
\stopitemize
This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after
\type{\stopitemize}.
\startitemize
im via ntg-context wrote:
> >>
> >>> %
> >>>
> >>> \setupindenting[medium,yes]
> >>> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
> >>>
> >>>\startitemize
> >>> \item One
> >&g
On 4/17/2023 7:06 AM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote:
%
\setupindenting[medium,yes]
\setupitemize
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > %
> >
> > \setupindenting[medium,yes]
> > \setupitemize[indentnext=
llowing example:
>> %
>> \setupindenting[medium,yes]
>> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
>> \startitemize
>> \item One
>> \stopitemize
>> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after
>> \type{\stopitemize}.
>> \sta
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023, Jim via ntg-context wrote:
> In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the
> following example:
>
> %
>
> \setupindenting[medium,yes]
> \setupit
llowing example:
>> %
>> \setupindenting[medium,yes]
>> \setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
>> \startitemize
>> \item One
>> \stopitemize
>> This paragraph should be indented - due to the blank line after
>> \type{\stopi
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Jim via ntg-context wrote:
> In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the
> following example:
>
> %
>
> \setupindenting[medium,ye
In the wiki page https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Indentation there is the
following example:
%
\setupindenting[medium,yes]
\setupitemize[indentnext=auto]
\startitemize
\item One
\stopitemize
This paragraph should
Wolfgang, thank you for this expalantion.
Kind regards
Willi
> On 18 Dec 2019, at 23:15, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
> Willi Egger schrieb am 18.12.2019 um 19:58:
>> Wolfgans, Hraban,
>>
>> thank you very much for this instruction!
>>
>> - In the real itemlist I have of course
Willi Egger schrieb am 18.12.2019 um 19:58:
Wolfgans, Hraban,
thank you very much for this instruction!
- In the real itemlist I have of course \startitemize (sorry for the ommission
in the MWE
- I misinterpreted the Wiki. There is no mentioning in the red section that n
is possible. However
Willi Egger schrieb am 18.12.2019 um 19:09:
Hello everybody,
I just wanted to typeset a simple file with a adaptet itemization. Howewer none
of the options have effect. Do I miss somehting or is itemize broken?
1. As Hraban already wrote you're missing \start|stopitamize.
2. You put the "n"
ting or is itemize broken?
>
>
> MWE:
> % \setupitemize[packed][n,left={Step~},n]
>
> \setupitemgroup[itemize][1][packed][left={Step~},n]
>
> \starttext
> \startitem
> Start with this\dots
> \stopitem
> \startitem
&g
Hello everybody,
I just wanted to typeset a simple file with a adaptet itemization. Howewer none
of the options have effect. Do I miss somehting or is itemize broken?
MWE:
% \setupitemize[packed][n,left={Step~},n]
\setupitemgroup[itemize][1][packed][left={Step~},n]
\starttext
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:40:36 +1300
Henri Menke wrote:
> On 30/09/18 13:17, Alan Braslau wrote:
> > Silly question:
> >
> > How do I setup itemize so that there be no hanging indent and the symbol is
> > aligned with the left edge of the text, i.e. not in the margin? (margin or
> > inmargin or
On 30/09/18 13:17, Alan Braslau wrote:
> Silly question:
>
> How do I setup itemize so that there be no hanging indent and the symbol is
> aligned with the left edge of the text, i.e. not in the margin? (margin or
> inmargin or width=-2em puts the symbol in the margin.)
Not sure whether I
Silly question:
How do I setup itemize so that there be no hanging indent and the symbol is
aligned with the left edge of the text, i.e. not in the margin? (margin or
inmargin or width=-2em puts the symbol in the margin.)
Alan
On 12/11/2014 7:04 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\showframe\showgrid
\setuppapersize[A6]
\setupitemize[inbetween={\blank[preference,big]}]
\starttext
\dorecurse{3}{\dorecurse{3}{Sometimes is really hard
to place list items. Am
of the following:
\setupitemgroup[itemize][loose][margin=yes, blank=halfline]
\setupitemize[loose][margin=yes, blank=halfline]
But none of them works. What would be the right setup command?
Many thansk for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
-ade.com/general/qrcs/setup-en.pdf#page=34, I thought
it could be one of the following:
\setupitemgroup[itemize][loose][margin=yes, blank=halfline]
\setupitemize[loose][margin=yes, blank=halfline]
But none of them works. What would be the right setup command?
\setupitemize[each][loose
On 12/12/2014 06:53 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 12.12.2014 um 16:32 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
On 12/12/2014 09:36 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
[...]
maybe
\startitemize[loose]
Many thanks for your reply, Hans
What would be the way to add it in a setup command?
[...]
\setupitemize[each
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\showframe\showgrid
\setuppapersize[A6]
\setupitemize[inbetween={\blank[preference,big]}]
\starttext
\dorecurse{3}{\dorecurse{3}{Sometimes is really hard
to place list items. Am I missing something? }\par}
\startitemize
A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-,
lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that
setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize
(and groups defined by defineitemgroup).
~~~snip~~~
\setupenumerations [numberconversion
Am 20.02.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de:
A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-,
lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that
setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize
(and groups defined
that
setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize
(and groups defined by defineitemgroup).
~~~snip~~~
\setupenumerations [numberconversion=numbers]
\starttext
\startitemize[a]
\item Text Text
\item Text Text
\stopitemize
\stoptext
~~~snip~~~
vs.
~~~snip~~~
%\setupenumerations
: 2014.1.29
int: english/english
Is this a bug or do I misunderstand the options for setupitemize?
bug
fixed in next beta
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27
Is this a bug or do I misunderstand the options for setupitemize?
Thanks,
Casey
S Casey Jones
Math Teacher and Department Chair
Hillgrove High School | Powder Springs, Georgia | USA
___
If your question is of interest to others
Xan wrote:
/ Hi,
//
// Is there any way for setupitemize only for \startitemize[a]?
// I want do something like:
//
// \setupitemize[a][left=(,right=),stopper=]
/
\defineitemgroup[myitemize] ...
Uf!, too much complicated.
I wonder if in the future we could set up itemize lists of some
Hi,
Is there any way for setupitemize only for \startitemize[a]?
I want do something like:
\setupitemize[a][left=(,right=),stopper=]
Thanks,
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
Xan wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way for setupitemize only for \startitemize[a]?
I want do something like:
\setupitemize[a][left=(,right=),stopper=]
\defineitemgroup[myitemize] ...
-
Hans
this:
\setupitemize[headstyle=\bf\groupedcommand{}{:}, width=5em, distance=1em]
\starttext
\startitemize
\txt{Short}
\input tufte
\txt{Very very very long}
\input tufte
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Should \head better be used for this purpose? And if yes, how?
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact
command. I've chosen \txt{},
because I need something like this:
\setupitemize[headstyle=\bf\groupedcommand{}{:}, width=5em, distance=1em]
\starttext
\startitemize
\txt{Short}
\input tufte
\txt{Very very very long}
\input tufte
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Should \head better be used
On Tue, Jun 24 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\setupitemize[headstyle=\bf\groupedcommand{}{:}, width=5em, distance=1em]
\starttext
\startitemize
\txt{Short}
\input tufte
\txt{Very very very long}
\input tufte
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Should \head better be used
On Mon, Jun 23 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The parameter afterhead seems to be ignored (MKII and MKIV):
There is no \head in your numeration.
Indeed, but headstyle applies nevertheless.
\setupitemize[afterhead=:]
Try:
\def\aftercolon{\groupedcommand{}{:}}
\setupitemize
\head, the result is interesting :)
\setupitemize[afterhead=:]
\starttext
\startitemize
\head This is a test
what happens here
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Certainly not what I would have expected.
Aditya___
If your
\setupitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stoptext
How do I make the second the same as the first?
Shouldn't you wrap the second one with \startstop itemize?
\setupitemize[width=12pt]
\startitemize
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stopitemize
Aditya
Well, I hope not!
As far
=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stopitemize
\setupitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stoptext
How do I make the second the same as the first?
Shouldn't you wrap the second one with \startstop itemize?
\setupitemize[width=12pt]
\startitemize
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
Steffen Wolfrum a crit:
The bib module won't help (I assume): the bibliography is already
typed, not generated.
Steffen
Hi Steffen, Aditya,
I'm agree with Aditya, Taco can surely help on this point...
I'm also interested by this feature (to Taco: since IEEE bib formatting
follows
\startitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stopitemize
\setupitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stoptext
How do I make the second the same as the first?
Shouldn't you wrap the second one with \startstop itemize?
\setupitemize[width=12pt
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Steffen Wolfrum a écrit :
The bib module won't help (I assume): the bibliography is already
typed, not generated.
Steffen
Hi Steffen, Aditya,
I'm agree with Aditya, Taco can surely help on this point...
I'm also interested by this feature (to Taco: since IEEE
um 07:32 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi, both paragraph should be indented 12 pt. But there are
different: \starttext \startitemize[width=12pt] \sym{\endash}
\input tufte \stopitemize \setupitemize[width=12pt] \sym
{\endash}\input tufte \stoptext How
Taco Hoekwater a écrit :
It would not be very hard to add this feature to the module,
but that will probably not help Steffen in this case.
Taco
Yes, but you're also a ConTeXt guru, no ? ;)
PS to Taco: No more time for #context ?
Renaud
___
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi Renaud,
sure, here it is:
\starttext
\def\Textit{\groupedcommand\it\/}
\def\hangover{\hangafter=1\hangindent=16pt }
Try this:
\def\dashauthor
{\leavevmode\hbox to 16pt{\endash\hss}\ignorespaces}
\hangover{\dashauthor} Die parlamentarische
Very nice!
Thank you Taco.
Steffen
Am 27.07.2006 um 10:36 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi Renaud,
sure, here it is:
\starttext
\def\Textit{\groupedcommand\it\/}
\def\hangover{\hangafter=1\hangindent=16pt }
Try this:
\def\dashauthor
Hi,
both paragraph should be indented 12 pt. But there are different:
\starttext
\startitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stopitemize
\setupitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stoptext
How do I make the second the same as the first?
Steffen
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
both paragraph should be indented 12 pt. But there are different:
\starttext
\startitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stopitemize
\setupitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stoptext
How do I make the second
Am 27.07.2006 um 07:32 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
both paragraph should be indented 12 pt. But there are different:
\starttext
\startitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input tufte
\stopitemize
\setupitemize[width=12pt]
\sym{\endash}\input
Hello,
\setupitemize[packed][margin=3em]
does not work, but
\setupitemize[packed]
\setupitemize[margin=3em]
works.
Is this normal or a bug?`
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http
On Wed, 24 May 2006 17:53:54 +0200 (CEST), Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
\setupitemize[packed][margin=3em]
does not work, but
\setupitemize[packed]
\setupitemize[margin=3em]
works.
Is this normal or a bug?`
I guess it's because that with more than one option group
Why does
\setupitemize[packed,paragraph]
ignore the packed option?
Another way would probably be to say
\setupitemize[packed,joinedup],
but I would only like some additional space after the itemization and
none before. \setupitemize[joinedup] produces the same result as
\setupitemize
Hi,
I'm trying to configure my itemization environment so that
second level switches to a smaller font.
Sorry I cannot help you here.
I imagine I'm doing something wrong but could not figure what ...
(setupitemize[1][before=\tx] is works well)
the before= after= and between= seem
Hi,
I'm trying to configure my itemization environment so that
second level switches to a smaller font.
The following code does not produce the expected result (no change in
font size).
I imagine I'm doing something wrong but could not figure what ...
(setupitemize[1][before=\tx] is works well
53 matches
Mail list logo
